Contingency Leadership and Its Key Components

https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12245929/

     According to Achua, C. & Lussier, R. in our 6th edition Leadership book, the word contingency is described as "it depends" (2016). Seems as a fitting definition as a leader is to hold an appropriate fit between their behavior and style and the followers and the situation (2016). Every situation deserves its own praise, style, and learning curve. 

     Key components of contingency theory (Subramaniam, N., n.d.):
  • There is no such thing as a universal way to manage others.
  • Organization of employees and tasks needs to fit with the given environment.
  • Effective businesses have a good fit between systems of all levels.
  • Both tasks and the design of completing them need to fit with the overall needs of the business.
     When I hold a process improvement workshop I try to involve a cross functional team with those in salaried and direct positions especially with those involved in the focus area of improvement. Usually this creates a diverse involvement of experience and know-how between everyone and I, as the facilitator, must be careful of the dynamics created with the membership. I always set an agenda, though it may not always be followed, it does give a direction of tasks that, at the lest, must be followed and met, such as housekeeping rules (breaks, language, and acceptance of all ideas). 

     In determining the best of the big behavioral theories from Ohio State, Michigan, or Iowa State I would believe that Ohio State's is the better. My reasoning is a group of researchers at Ohio State University sought to identify the observable behaviors of leaders in 1945 (Kumar, M. n.d.), earlier than the others. From all the research I have seen there is always studies and research that continues to this day that brings insight to other behaviors and styles of leaders. Though the early researchers have determined the basics and groundwork for latter studies, it was OSU that started the thought of understanding how leaders can expedite their status.





References:

Achua, C. & Lussier, R. (2016). Leadership. Theory, Application, & Skill Development. Cengage Learning: Boston, MA

Subramaniam, N. (n.d.). Contingency Theory. Open School of Management. Retrieved from https://www.openschoolofmanagement.com/contingency-theory-management-theory

Kumar., M. (n.d.). Ohio State Leadership Model. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/108685656/Ohio-State--Leadership-Model



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About Uber Uber Utopia? Their Ethics, Culture, and Diversity From nothing more than an idea in 2008 because two gentlemen, Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp, could not get a ride on a December evening, and with the thought of being stranded, spawned a driving company that is like how hailing a cab used to be, except now you press a button on your phone and the app is hailing a driver who is driving their own vehicle. UberCab began as “everyone’s private driver” and quickly grew into a global logistics layer, transforming an entire industry in the process (newsroom, 2019). It was October 2010 that management dropped the “cab” name as they no longer wanted to be familiarized with the taxicab industry. But is Uber becoming the company they want to be? The drivers’ behavior, The CEO of Uber (Kalanick) videotaped arguing with a driver and poor reputation has created loses in market share and possible more issues in the future. So is it the company’s ethical beliefs in question? Is
Read more

Leader - Follower Theories

Image
Week 3 Blog Leader - Follower Theories      To become an effective follower it is important to acquire the skills necessary to combine two opposing follower rules - to execute decisions made by a leader, and yet to be able to raise issues about those decisions when they are deemed misguided or unethical (Achua, C. & Lussier, R., 2016). Moral integrity and a willingness to take stands based on principle are distinguishing characteristics of the effective follower (2016).       Followership theory argues that leadership cannot be fully understood without a meaningful consideration of the followers' impact on the leadership process (Cerne, M., & Bunjak, A., 2018).       I believe a leader can maintain a personal relationship with some, if not all, members of the work group or team without creating the perception of in-groups and out-groups. This can be a fine line relationship between leaders and followers as could also be dependent on each group that the
Read more